Open Access Open Access  Accesso riservato Abbonamento o quota di accesso

Aspetti medico-legali della teleradiologia. Che cosa ci hanno insegnato i casi di Marlia e Barga

Grazia Carosielli, Concetta Brugaletta, Alessandra De Palma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7175/pmeal.v9i4.1212

Abstract

Telemedicine is the use of information and telecommunications technology to provide, support and supplement traditional health care services at a distance, thus overcome the presence of physical, geographical, social and cultural barriers, and ensure effective and equitable availability of access to healthcare. However, in spite of the opportunities granted by the Telemedicine, its spread in the country is still affected by the presence of medico-legal problems.

Teleradiology, the sector with the most large application e-Health service, uses integrated systems capable of transferring multimedia remote radiographs, ultrasound and computerized axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, for their interpretation, to ask for a second opinion in particularly complex cases, for a collegial review of a case and, finally, for a diagnosis in cases of emergency.

In 2013, doctors and medical technicians of Radiology, working in two hospitals posted of AUSL 2 Lucca (“Marlia” and “S. Francesco di Barga”), were indicted for the crime of the unauthorised practice of the medical profession and for the violation of legal obligations relating to radiation protection. During the trials it was found that in the two hospitals were provided, after prescription, radiological basic building blocks, and the images were interpreted by a radiologist not present in the place, but using computer technology (RIS-PACS System).

Criminal trials under review, in which all defendants were acquitted as requested by the prosecution, suggest that if the evidence and the law had been further enhanced, already under preliminary investigation, criminal prosecution would not have even started.

In addition, the changes introduced by the Telemedicine services – among them the reorganization of the mode of service delivery, and the revolution of the doctor-patient relationship – impose a reflection on how to evaluate the responsibility of the professionals involved.

Parole chiave

Telemedicine; Technology; Quality of care; Legislation; Liability

Testo completo

HTML PDF

Riferimenti bibliografici

  • Ministero della Salute. Telemedicina. Linee di indirizzo nazionali. Approvate dall’Assemblea generale del Consiglio Superiore di Sanità durante la seduta del 10/07/2012. Disponibile online su http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_2129_allegato.pdf (ultimo accesso novembre 2015)
  • Daniel H, Sulmasy LS; ACP Health and Public Policy Committee. Policy recommendations to guide the use of telemedicine in primary care settings: an American college of physicians position paper. Ann Intern Med 2015; Sep 8; doi: 10.7326/M15-0498
  • Field MJ (ed). Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Evaluating Clinical Applications of Telemedicine. Telemedicine: A guide to assessing telecommunications in health care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 1996
  • Zagra M, Zerbo S, Argo A. Informatica, web e telemedicina. In: Zagra M, Argo A, Madea B, Procaccianti P (eds). Medicina Legale orientata per problemi. Milano: Elsevier Editore, 2011
  • Argo A, Passavanti A, Zerbo S, et al. Problematiche medico legali connesse alla telemedicina: illustrazione del sistema “Cardiovox” nell’Azienda Sanitaria locale n. 9 di Trapani. Riv Ital Med Leg 1999; 4-5: 1125
  • Routsalainen P. Privacy and security in teleradiology. Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jan;73(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.018.
  • European Society of Radiology. ESR statement on the European Commission Staff Working Document on the applicability of the existing EU legal framework to telemedicine services (SWD 2012/413), 2013
  • European Society of Radiology. ESR white paper on teleradiology: an update from the teleradiology subgroup. Insights Imaging 2014; 5: 1-8; doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0307-z
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità. A cura del Gruppo di Studio per l’Assicurazione di Qualità in Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica. Rapporti ISTISAN 10/44. Linee guida per l’assicurazione di qualità in teleradiologia, 2010
  • Natoli CM. Summary of findings: malpractice and telemedicine. Washington, DC: Center for Telehealth & e-Health Law, 2009. Disponibile online su www.ctel.org/research/Summary%20of%20Findings%20Malpractice%20and%20Telemedicine.pdf (ultimo
  • accesso novembre 2015)
  • Cascella LM. Virtual Risk: an overview of telehealth from a risk management perspective. Disponibile online su www.medpro.com/documents/10502/2820774/Virtual+Risk+-+An+Overview+of+Telehealth.pdf (ultimo accesso novembre 2015)
  • Società Italiana Radiologia Medica (SIRM). Teleradiologia. Indicazioni e raccomandazioni all’uso. Documento approvato dal Consiglio Direttivo in data 8 giugno 2001
  • Asch D. The hidden economics of telemedicine. Ann Intern Med 2015; Sep 8; doi: 10.7326/M15-1416

Statistiche

Abstract: 1203 visualizzazioni
HTML: 4235 visualizzazioni
PDF: 18 visualizzazioni

Refback

  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.


Copyright (c) 2015