How to report a review?

Giuseppe La Torre, Brigid Unim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7175/rhc.v2i3.45

Keywords

Narrative reviews; Systematic reviews; Journals

Full Text

HTML PDF

References

  • Maina S, Di Napoli M. How many authors are needed to write a review? Reviews in Health Care 2011; 2: 83-6
  • Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and Elaboration. Ital J Public Health 2009; 6: 354-91
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264-9
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2006) Randomized controlled trials registration/application checklist. Available at: www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents rct_reg_e.pdf
  • Young C, Horton R. Putting clinical trials into context. Lancet 2005; 366: 107-8
  • Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, Sampson M, Altman DG. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med 2007; 4: e78
  • Atkins D, Fink K, Slutsky J. Better information for better health care: The Evidence-based Practice Center program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 1035-41
  • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: University of York; 2009. Available at: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/pdf/Systematic_Reviews.pdf
  • Pitak-Arnnop P, Sader R, Rapidis AD, Dhanuthai K, Bauer U, Hervé C, et al. Publication bias in oral and maxillofacial surgery journals: an observation on published controlled trials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010; 38: 4-10
  • Atlas MC. Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact biomedical journals. J Med Libr Assoc 2003; 91: 442-9
  • Sorinola O, Olufowobi O, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. Instructions to authors for case reporting are limited: a review of a core journal list. BMC Med Educ 2004; 4: 4
  • Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011; 39: 91-2
  • Dickersin K. How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. AIDS Educ Prev 1997; 9: 15-21
  • Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337: 867-72
  • Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990; 263: 1385-9
  • Ioannidis JP. Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. JAMA 1998; 279: 281-6
  • Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess 2010; 14: iii, ix-xi, 1-193
  • Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700
  • Booth A, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M, Stewart L. An international registry of systematic-review protocols. Lancet 2011; 377: 108-9
  • Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Vist GE, Liberati A, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 1049-51
  • Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924-6

Statistics

Abstract: 1233 views
HTML: 206 views
PDF: 185 views

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




© SEEd srl