Il danno da emotrasfusione: dieci sentenze delle Sezioni Unite della Cassazione. II parte
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7175/pmeal.v3i2.365
Abstract
The first part of this article, published in the 2008; 4(2) issue of this Journal, examined ten judgements of the United Sections of the Court of Cassation concerning negligent transfusion of infected blood, with transmission of hepatitis virus, B or C, or HIV. In this second part, the Author analyses some of these legal decisions with attention to prescription of the judgement, worsening of the infected patient, value of Commissions proceedings, and causal connection.
Parole chiave
Transfusion of infected blood; Negligence; Legal decisions
Testo completo
Statistiche
Abstract: 505 visualizzazioniPDF: 794 visualizzazioni
Refback
- Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.
Copyright (c) 2012